Where the model lives
In Sanity, schemas are code, reviewed and versioned like the rest of your project. In Contentful, the model is configured in the browser.
Both are leading headless CMSs used by serious content teams. Sanity leans toward flexibility and customisation. Contentful leans toward a configured, enterprise-ready platform.
Choose Sanity if you want the content model defined in code, an editing studio you can shape around your workflow, and real-time collaboration.
Choose Contentful if you want a mature, configure-in-the-browser platform with a large app ecosystem and established enterprise processes.
We’re an official Framer Expert Partner and we build on Astro, Sanity, and Contentful too, so this is the version we give clients.
| Sanity | Contentful | |
|---|---|---|
| Content model | Defined in code, versioned with your project | Defined in the web interface |
| Editing interface | Sanity Studio, highly customisable | Contentful web app, configurable with apps |
| Collaboration | Real-time, simultaneous editing | Workflows, tasks, and comments |
| Querying | GROQ and GraphQL | REST and GraphQL |
| Customisation | Deep; the studio is built with React | Through the app framework and UI extensions |
| Localisation | Supported, with flexible approaches | Built in, at field and entry level |
| Pricing | Generous free tier, usage-based growth | Tiered plans, with enterprise at the top end |
| Best known for | Flexibility and developer experience | Enterprise maturity and ecosystem |
Content model
Editing interface
Collaboration
Querying
Customisation
Localisation
Pricing
Best known for
In Sanity, schemas are code, reviewed and versioned like the rest of your project. In Contentful, the model is configured in the browser.
Sanity Studio can be reshaped around your editors. Contentful offers a consistent interface extended through apps.
The two price growth differently. Model your users, locales, and content volume on both before deciding.
Contentful has a long enterprise track record and a large marketplace. Sanity has a fast-moving platform and strong developer community.
Astro vs Next.js for marketing and content sites: performance, developer experience, CMS options, and when each framework is the right call.
Read the comparisonFramer vs Webflow from a team that built in both: why Framer wins on cost, page speed, CMS, safe editing, and AI workflows for marketing and content sites.
Read the comparisonFramer vs WordPress for marketing websites: design, editing, maintenance, performance, and flexibility, and which to choose for your team.
Read the comparisonNeither is better for everyone. Sanity is more flexible and developer-friendly. Contentful is more configured and established in enterprise settings. Match the tool to your team and workflow.
Often at small and mid scale, but it depends on users, locales, API usage, and content volume. Model both against your real numbers.
Yes. Content types map to Sanity schemas, and entries, assets, and references are migrated by script with a reconciliation pass.
Contentful is consistent out of the box. Sanity can be easier once the studio is tailored to your team, which takes some setup.
Yes. Both connect to Astro, Next.js, and most modern frameworks.