Automated · Agents run the checks
Continuous crawls against production. Every rule in your standard. No human spends thirty hours on this.
Every site we ship stays continuously monitored.
Accessibility, SEO, performance, links, redirects, metadata, analytics, and design-system compliance, checked against a written standard continuously, with a named human accountable for what the checks find.
The problem
Websites decay quietly.
Nothing announces itself. A redirect breaks, a tag gets removed, a component change wrecks focus order, and six months later someone notices the numbers are wrong.
Nobody gets paged
A broken redirect or a dropped analytics tag doesn't take the site down. It just quietly costs you traffic and data.
Audits are a snapshot
An accessibility PDF from March tells you nothing about the twelve pages published since. The finding was true once.
Publishing outpaces review
Content teams ship faster than anyone can check. Governance becomes something that happened at launch.
Accessibility regresses silently
One component change breaks focus order on every page that uses it. Nothing looks different in a screenshot.
Analytics break invisibly
A tag removed during an unrelated change can cost a full quarter of attribution before anyone reconciles the numbers.
Design systems drift
One-off overrides accumulate until the system is decorative and every new page is a negotiation.
What we monitor
Checked continuously, against a standard.
The standard is written down for your site specifically, so a pass or a fail means something rather than being a tool's opinion.
- Accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA)
- Broken internal and external links
- Metadata uniqueness and length
- Core Web Vitals and performance budgets
- Consent and privacy compliance
- Design-system compliance and drift
- Keyboard and focus order
- Redirect chains and 404s
- Heading hierarchy and semantics
- Sitemap and robots integrity
- Conversion and form submission paths
- Content integrity and orphan pages
- Colour contrast against tokens
- Responsive behaviour at real breakpoints
- Structured data and schema validity
- Analytics and tag firing
- Visual regressions on key templates
- Uptime and SSL expiry
How it works
Agents check. Humans decide.
This is deliberately not a dashboard we hand you. Dashboards move the work to your team. The point of the service is that someone else owns the outcome.
Triage · We review what failed
A person separates real regressions from noise, and decides what matters. Accountability sits with a named human.
Action · You get a short report
What changed, what we fixed, and what needs a decision from you. Included fix hours cover the small stuff.
What you get
The actual deliverable.
A written standard
Your site's quality bar, documented: accessibility target, performance budgets, metadata rules, and design-system constraints.
Continuous automated checks
Scheduled crawls and audits against that standard, at a frequency matched to how often you publish.
Human triage
Someone reviews every failure, discards the noise, and tells you which ones actually matter and why.
A monthly report
Short and readable: what regressed, what we fixed, what's trending, and what needs a decision.
Included fix hours
Small regressions get fixed rather than reported. Larger work gets scoped separately, with your approval.
Regression alerts
Anything urgent (a broken conversion path, a dropped tag, a crawl blocker) reaches you the same day.
Plans
Priced by scale, not by seat.
Monitor
$2,000/ month
For marketing sites that need someone watching, with a clear report every month.
- Monthly full-site crawl
- Accessibility, SEO and link checks
- Core Web Vitals tracking
- Monthly written report
- 2 fix hours included
- Same-day alerts on critical failures
Maintain
Most popular$5,000/ month
For sites publishing regularly, where drift and regressions need catching quickly.
- Weekly crawls and audits
- Everything in Monitor
- Visual regression on key templates
- Design-system compliance checks
- Analytics and conversion verification
- 8 fix hours included
- Quarterly review call
Managed
$10,000+/ month
For large or multi-site estates with compliance obligations and multiple publishing teams.
- Continuous monitoring
- Everything in Maintain
- Multi-site and multi-region coverage
- VPAT and compliance reporting support
- Editorial governance review
- 24 fix hours included
- Named account engineer
- Monthly stakeholder reporting
Honest assessment
When this is worth paying for.
If your site is small, stable, and nobody's compliance department has ever emailed you, this is overhead. We'd rather tell you that than sell it.
Worth it when
- The site is a primary revenue channel
- Multiple people publish to it
- You have accessibility or compliance obligations
- Organic search matters commercially
- You've just finished a migration worth protecting
- Nobody internally owns quality end to end
Skip it when
- The site is small and rarely changes
- You have an internal team already doing this
- There's no compliance or revenue pressure
- You'd rather buy tools than an outcome
- The site is a placeholder
FAQs
Monitoring questions.
Isn't this just running a tool?
The tools are the cheap part, and you could buy them yourself. What you're paying for is a standard written for your site, a human who triages every failure, and fixes that actually get shipped.
Do we have to have built the site with you?
No. We'll run a baseline audit on any site and write the standard from there. Sites we built are cheaper to monitor because the standard already exists.
What counts as a fix hour?
Small, contained regressions such as a broken link, a missing meta description, a contrast failure, or a redirect. Anything larger gets scoped and quoted separately before we touch it.
Can you guarantee WCAG compliance?
Nobody honestly can, because compliance depends on content people publish daily. What we guarantee is continuous checking against the standard and a named person accountable for the findings.
How is this different from an annual audit?
An audit tells you the state of the site on one day. This tells you when that state changes, which is the only version that's useful once a site is live.
Does it replace our developers?
No. It catches the things that are tedious for humans to check and easy for anyone to miss, so your team spends its time on work that needs judgment.