Understand
Business goals, publishing workflow, content inventory, integrations, and what's constraining the current site.
A modern frontend with a visual CMS on top, so the site is genuinely fast and your marketing team can still publish without a developer.
Why Astro
Astro is the default recommendation for content-heavy marketing sites where performance matters and the content model is more than a flat list of pages.
Pages ship as HTML and CSS. Interactivity is added deliberately as islands rather than hydrating the whole page.
Content collections give you schema validation and reuse, so the same content can serve multiple pages and channels.
Editors get a visual editing experience with live preview, so a modern stack doesn't cost you publishing autonomy.
Branches, preview deploys, code review, and rollback, which is what makes changing a site safe.
React, Svelte, or Vue components can coexist where they're genuinely needed, without committing the whole site to one.
Static output on a CDN. No PHP runtime, no origin database, no caching plugin stack to maintain.
What's included
Process
Business goals, publishing workflow, content inventory, integrations, and what's constraining the current site.
IA, content model, CMS choice, integration plan, and hosting architecture agreed before design starts.
A component-based visual system built around real content, not placeholder copy.
Astro components, content collections, CMS wiring, and integrations, with preview deploys from day one.
Accessibility audit, Core Web Vitals, analytics verification, content QA, and editorial UAT.
Deployment, DNS, redirects, analytics verification, then post-launch monitoring and training.
Honest assessment
We recommend Astro often, but not universally. Here's the line we draw.
Astro · Sanity · Contentful · React · Tailwind · Vercel · Cloudflare · HubSpot · GA4
Tools: Astro, Sanity, Contentful, React, Vercel, HubSpot
Migrating in
Move from a plugin-heavy monolith to a fast, modern frontend and flexible visual CMS.
View migration pathKeep marketing autonomy while moving beyond the limitations of an all-in-one platform.
View migration pathGet marketing pages out of the product repo and off the product release cycle.
View migration pathRelevant work
FAQs
Yes. A visual CMS layer sits on top so editors compose pages from approved components with live preview. Publishing autonomy is a requirement of the build, not an add-on.
If the site is content and marketing, Astro. If it's an application with a marketing surface attached, Next.js. Most companies have both, and the mistake is running the marketing site on the app's architecture.
It depends on your content model, team size, and governance needs. Sanity for flexible structured content, Contentful where enterprise workflow matters, and a visual CMS layer for page composition.
Yes, as islands where interactivity is genuinely needed. The rest renders as static HTML, which is the whole point.
A marketing site is typically eight to fourteen weeks including design. Migrating an existing site without a redesign can be as quick as six.
Usually Vercel or Cloudflare. If you need it inside your own infrastructure, static output makes that straightforward.