The platform outweighs the site
Licensing and infrastructure costs are hard to justify for what the site actually does.
Adobe Experience Manager is built for the largest content operations. Many teams find they are paying for, and maintaining, far more platform than their website uses.
If your site is primarily marketing and content, and the wider Adobe suite isn’t central to how you work, move to a headless CMS such as Sanity or Contentful with an Astro frontend. Publishing gets faster and the platform gets much lighter.
If you depend on AEM Assets, Adobe Target, and Adobe Analytics working together, and have a strong AEM team, staying is usually the right choice.
Licensing and infrastructure costs are hard to justify for what the site actually does.
AEM development requires Java and platform expertise that is scarce and expensive.
Editors work through complex authoring and approval flows for simple updates.
Moving versions, or to AEM as a Cloud Service, takes significant time and budget.
The integration that justified AEM isn’t delivering in practice.
Teams leaving AEM usually want to keep structured content and governance while dropping most of the platform around it.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
| Headless CMS (Sanity or Contentful) | Content reused across the website, product, and other channels | Editors, in structured content models | More architecture to plan before you build |
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Option
Headless CMS (Sanity or Contentful)
Not every site needs to move. Here’s the honest version.
Content fragments, pages, assets, and workflows are mapped to a new content model, with approvals and permissions rebuilt in the new CMS.
Built a full-stack prototype in Bolt? Spot the signs it has outgrown the browser, see where Bolt builds should go next, and ship it without starting over.
Read the guideFacing a Contentful price jump or hitting its limits? Compare moving to Sanity, Astro content collections, or Framer, and see when staying on Contentful makes sense.
Read the guideFacing a Drupal upgrade or rising maintenance costs? Compare moving to Astro or a headless CMS like Sanity or Contentful, and see when staying on Drupal makes sense.
Read the guideThe most common reasons are licensing and hosting costs, a shortage of AEM developers, slow publishing, and using only a small part of what the platform offers.
For most marketing and content sites, a headless CMS such as Sanity or Contentful with an Astro frontend. Asset management can move to a dedicated DAM if you need one.
Yes. Assets and their metadata are exported and moved into the new CMS or a dedicated DAM, with references updated throughout the content.
Yes. Sanity and Contentful both support multi-site and localised content, with permissions and workflows per team or market.
Most take sixteen to twenty-eight weeks, depending on sites, languages, assets, and integrations. We scope it after a discovery audit.