Performance has plateaued
Core Web Vitals stall no matter how much is optimised, because the bottleneck is the platform itself.
We move complex websites onto modern platforms without losing the content, SEO equity, integrations, or functionality your business depends on.
Eventually the platform starts setting the ceiling. These are the five reasons teams actually call us.
Core Web Vitals stall no matter how much is optimised, because the bottleneck is the platform itself.
Every change needs a developer. Marketing waits in a queue to update a page.
Plugin updates, security patches, and breakage consume time that should go into the site itself.
The marketing site sits in the same repo and release process as the product, so nothing ships quickly.
Nobody is confident the redesign can ship without losing rankings, integrations, or content.
Migration Paths
Move from a plugin-heavy monolith to a fast, modern frontend and flexible visual CMS.
View migration pathKeep marketing autonomy while moving beyond the limitations of an all-in-one platform.
View migration pathA simpler stack for marketing teams that prioritize visual control and publishing velocity.
View migration pathMove to a modern visual workflow while preserving content, SEO, redirects, and analytics.
View migration pathFor engineering-led teams whose marketing site doesn't need application-level React architecture.
View migration pathDrupal, Sitecore, AEM, or custom platforms onto a modern headless architecture.
View migration pathAnswer three questions and we'll point you at the platform we'd recommend, and the most useful page for your move.
Our recommendation
Tools: WordPress, Webflow, Squarespace, Wix, HubSpot, Drupal, Sitecore, Contentful, Gatsby, Next.js, v0, Framer, Astro, Sanity
Start with the platform you're on. Each guide covers the signs it's time, where teams usually land, and when staying is the better call.
Guides, comparisons, and tools for planning a migration.
Checklist
A step-by-step SEO checklist for website migrations, from URL inventory and redirect mapping to launch and monitoring, plus a free redirect map template.
ReadComparison
Framer vs Webflow from a team that built in both: why Framer wins on cost, page speed, CMS, safe editing, and AI workflows for marketing and content sites.
ReadComparison
Astro vs Next.js for marketing and content sites: performance, developer experience, CMS options, and when each framework is the right call.
ReadComparison
Framer vs WordPress for marketing websites: design, editing, maintenance, performance, and flexibility, and which to choose for your team.
ReadComparison
Sanity vs Contentful compared: content modelling, editing experience, developer workflow, and pricing, and which headless CMS fits your team.
ReadGuide
Your Lovable app works and people are starting to rely on it. Here's how to tell when it needs a production rebuild, what we keep, and how the move works.
ReadGuide
Built a full-stack prototype in Bolt? Spot the signs it has outgrown the browser, see where Bolt builds should go next, and ship it without starting over.
ReadGuide
Turn the polished interfaces you made in v0 into a real product, with data, auth, testing, and a design system under the screens you already like.
Read
“Push Refresh was an exceptional partner throughout our site migration. The team was highly knowledgeable, responsive, and proactive at every stage. They met all deadlines and continued providing support as unexpected challenges arose. I'd gladly recommend them to anyone looking for a reliable, detail-oriented team.”
FAQ
Not if the migration is handled properly. URL mapping, redirects, metadata, structured data, and internal linking are planned before launch and monitored in Search Console afterwards. Short-term fluctuation is normal; sustained loss is a symptom of a migration done badly.
A straightforward marketing site is six to eight weeks. Several hundred pages with a redesign, complex CMS modelling, and integrations is typically twelve to twenty. We'll scope it properly after discovery.
It gets mapped and moved with migration scripts, then reconciled page by page against the original site. Content that no longer earns its place gets flagged rather than silently dropped.
Usually yes, and often it's cheaper than doing it twice. The exception is very large sites where separating the platform move from the redesign lowers risk. We'll say so if that's your situation.
Almost never. The new site is built and tested in parallel, then the DNS cutover happens on a planned window with rollback ready.
Yes. CRM, marketing automation, forms, analytics, search, chat, and anything else the business relies on gets re-implemented and verified as part of the migration.