The template is the ceiling
Your brand and layouts have outgrown what the template and its blocks can express.
Squarespace is a great way to launch. Companies leave when the site needs to do more than a template allows: custom design, deeper SEO control, or real integrations.
If you want more design freedom but still want marketing to own the site, move to Framer. If you need custom functionality, complex content, or tight performance control, move to Astro with a visual CMS.
If the site is small, the template still fits your brand, and it does what you need, Squarespace is a sensible place to stay.
Your brand and layouts have outgrown what the template and its blocks can express.
You want finer control over page structure, markup, and technical SEO than the platform gives you.
Prospects notice, and the site no longer matches how the company presents itself elsewhere.
CRM, marketing automation, and product data live in code injection and embeds.
Case studies, resources, and team pages need real content models, not repeated page layouts.
Companies moving off Squarespace typically want either more design control with the same ease, or a platform that can grow with them.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Framer | Marketing sites where the team wants to design and publish without a developer | Marketing, directly in a visual canvas | Not for application UI or content that feeds other channels |
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
Option
Framer
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Not every site needs to move. Here’s the honest version.
Pages, blog posts, products, and images are exported and rebuilt, and every URL is redirected to its new home.
Turn the polished interfaces you made in v0 into a real product, with data, auth, testing, and a design system under the screens you already like.
Read the guideLeaving Webflow? Framer matches its CMS, loads faster, is easier for marketing to edit, and is often around half the enterprise cost. See when Astro fits better instead.
Read the guideReady to move off Wix? Compare migrating to Framer or Astro for better performance, design control, and scalability, and see when staying makes sense.
Read the guideWhen the site needs custom design, stronger SEO control, structured content, or real integrations that templates and code injection can’t provide cleanly.
Framer for marketing-led sites that want more design freedom with easy publishing. Astro with a visual CMS for sites that need custom functionality or large amounts of structured content.
Framer gives you far more design control, so there is more to learn, but day-to-day editing of copy, images, and CMS content is just as direct. We hand over a component library so new pages look right by default.
Not with a proper migration: every URL is mapped to a 301 redirect, metadata carries across, and search performance is monitored after launch.
Yes. Posts, images, categories, and authors are exported and migrated into the new CMS, with redirects for every post URL.