Performance is out of your hands
Page weight and scripts are largely set by the platform, so tuning only goes so far.
Wix makes it easy to get online. Growing companies leave when they need a faster site, a more distinctive design, and a platform their team can scale with.
If you want a distinctive, fast marketing site your team can still edit visually, move to Framer. If you need custom functionality, large amounts of content, or maximum performance, move to Astro with a visual CMS.
If the site is simple, performs well enough, and rarely changes, staying on Wix is a reasonable choice.
Page weight and scripts are largely set by the platform, so tuning only goes so far.
The site looks like a site builder, and custom layouts fight the editor.
Content and design are tightly bound, so repeating or restructuring content is manual work.
The longer the site grows on the platform, the bigger the eventual extraction.
The site now carries real pipeline, and it needs a platform built for that responsibility.
Most companies leaving Wix want a more professional site without losing the ability to edit it themselves.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Framer | Marketing sites where the team wants to design and publish without a developer | Marketing, directly in a visual canvas | Not for application UI or content that feeds other channels |
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
Option
Framer
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Not every site needs to move. Here’s the honest version.
Wix doesn’t provide a full site export, so content is extracted with a planned process, rebuilt cleanly, and checked page by page.
Thinking about moving off WordPress but unsure where to go? Compare Framer, Astro, and headless CMS options, and see when staying put is the better call.
Read the guideIs Adobe Experience Manager more platform than your site needs? Compare moving to a headless CMS with Astro, and see when staying on AEM makes sense.
Read the guideBuilt a full-stack prototype in Bolt? Spot the signs it has outgrown the browser, see where Bolt builds should go next, and ship it without starting over.
Read the guideUsually for performance, design flexibility, and scalability. As a site becomes a meaningful sales channel, teams want more control than a site builder allows.
Not as a complete, working site. Content is extracted page by page or through available tools and APIs, then rebuilt on the new platform, which is why a planned migration matters.
Framer if you want a distinctive marketing site your team can edit visually. Astro with a visual CMS if you need custom functionality, lots of content, or top-tier performance.
Not when every URL is redirected, metadata is preserved, and search performance is monitored after launch. Many sites see improvements from better performance and structure.
Most small to mid-sized marketing sites take four to eight weeks, depending on page count, content volume, and whether we redesign at the same time.