Maintenance never ends
Plugin updates, PHP versions, and security patches take time every month, and something occasionally breaks.
If plugins, patches, and page builders are running the site instead of your team, it may be time to move. The right destination depends on who edits the site and how much content it carries.
If the site is mainly marketing pages and your team wants to publish without a developer, move to Framer. If it is content-heavy, performance-critical, or deeply integrated, move to Astro with a visual CMS. If the same content feeds the website, a product, and other channels, move to a headless CMS such as Sanity or Contentful.
If WordPress is stable, your team is comfortable in it, and a developer keeps it maintained, staying is a reasonable choice. Migrate because the platform is holding you back, not because it is old.
Plugin updates, PHP versions, and security patches take time every month, and something occasionally breaks.
Page builders and custom themes make simple changes risky, so marketing waits in a queue.
Caching plugins and image tools have been tried, and Core Web Vitals still won’t move.
Critical features depend on plugins that conflict, go unmaintained, or change licensing.
The site is a target because it runs WordPress, and hardening it is a job of its own.
Most WordPress sites land in one of three places. The deciding questions are who edits the site, how much content it has, and where that content needs to go.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Framer | Marketing sites where the team wants to design and publish without a developer | Marketing, directly in a visual canvas | Not for application UI or content that feeds other channels |
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
| Headless CMS (Sanity or Contentful) | Content reused across the website, product, and other channels | Editors, in structured content models | More architecture to plan before you build |
Option
Framer
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Option
Headless CMS (Sanity or Contentful)
The best visual builder for marketing sites: a full CMS, fast pages, safe editing, and native AI workflows.
View migration pathA fast, modern frontend with a visual CMS on top, for sites that have outgrown all-in-one platforms.
View migration pathStructured content in Sanity or Contentful, delivered to the site and anywhere else it needs to go.
View migration pathNot every site needs to move. Here’s the honest version.
Posts, pages, custom post types, ACF fields, and media all move by script, and page-builder markup is rebuilt as clean components.
Is Adobe Experience Manager more platform than your site needs? Compare moving to a headless CMS with Astro, and see when staying on AEM makes sense.
Read the guideBuilt a full-stack prototype in Bolt? Spot the signs it has outgrown the browser, see where Bolt builds should go next, and ship it without starting over.
Read the guideFacing a Contentful price jump or hitting its limits? Compare moving to Sanity, Astro content collections, or Framer, and see when staying on Contentful makes sense.
Read the guideIt is worth it when maintenance, publishing friction, or performance are costing you more than a rebuild would. If the site is stable and your team is productive in it, staying is often the better decision.
For most marketing sites, Framer: marketing can design and publish without a developer and there is almost nothing to maintain. For content-heavy or highly integrated sites, Astro with a visual CMS is usually the better fit.
Framer suits marketing-led sites, including content-rich ones, where the team wants to publish without developers. Astro suits sites that need custom integrations, multi-channel content, or developers who want full control of the code.
Not if the migration is done properly. Every indexed URL is mapped to a 301 redirect, metadata is carried across, and Search Console is monitored after launch.
Yes. A phased approach can move the marketing pages first and keep the blog on WordPress, or on a subdomain, until it is migrated.
A typical marketing site takes five to eight weeks including content migration. Larger sites, or a redesign in the same project, take longer, and we scope it after a discovery audit.