The UI is ahead of the foundations
The interface looks finished, but data, auth, and error handling are thin.
v0 generates polished React interfaces quickly. A product built from those pieces still needs data, auth, testing, and structure to be production-ready.
If the build is a product with real users, data, and a roadmap, rebuild it as a production React or Next.js codebase with proper auth, testing, and deployment. If it is a marketing site, rebuild it on Astro or Framer so it ranks, loads fast, and your team can edit it. v0 output is React and Tailwind, so components can often be refined rather than rewritten.
If you are still testing the idea with a handful of people, keep iterating in v0. Rebuild once the idea is proven, not before.
The interface looks finished, but data, auth, and error handling are thin.
Generated pieces are inconsistent, so the product drifts screen by screen.
Mock data and placeholder APIs need to become real, secure services.
The codebase needs structure, conventions, and tests to support a team.
Performance, accessibility, and monitoring need to be production grade.
v0 builds tend to be one of two things: a product that needs engineering foundations, or a website that needs to perform. Here is where each should go.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| A production React or Next.js codebase | Products that need real users, data, security, and a roadmap | Developers, in version control with code review | Needs engineering ownership after launch |
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
| Framer | Marketing sites where the team wants to design and publish without a developer | Marketing, directly in a visual canvas | Not for application UI or content that feeds other channels |
Option
A production React or Next.js codebase
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Option
Framer
A maintainable React or Next.js codebase with real auth, data, testing, and deployment.
Learn moreA fast, modern frontend with a visual CMS on top, for sites that have outgrown all-in-one platforms.
View migration pathThe best visual builder for marketing sites: a full CMS, fast pages, safe editing, and native AI workflows.
Learn morev0 is a great way to prove an idea. Here’s how to tell when it has done its job.
We start from what already works, keep the flows your users know, and rebuild the foundations underneath them.
Leaving Webflow? Framer matches its CMS, loads faster, is easier for marketing to edit, and is often around half the enterprise cost. See when Astro fits better instead.
Read the guideReady to move off Wix? Compare migrating to Framer or Astro for better performance, design control, and scalability, and see when staying makes sense.
Read the guideThinking about moving off WordPress but unsure where to go? Compare Framer, Astro, and headless CMS options, and see when staying put is the better call.
Read the guideSome can, for small audiences and low-risk use. Once real customers, sensitive data, or payments are involved, most v0 builds need an engineering review and usually a rebuild of the foundations.
Yes. We start with an audit of what was generated, keep what is sound, and rebuild what is not. Often the design and flows survive while auth, data, and structure are replaced.
Often, yes. v0 generates React with Tailwind and shadcn/ui, so good components can be refined into a proper design system rather than thrown away.
No. The screens, flows, and data that work today are the starting point. The rebuild keeps what users rely on and fixes what makes it fragile.
An audit takes one to two weeks. A rebuild of a typical early-stage product is usually six to twelve weeks, depending on scope and integrations.