Templates limit the design
Themes and modules make custom layouts slow to build and hard to change.
Plenty of teams love HubSpot for CRM and marketing automation but not for building the website. You can move the site and keep HubSpot doing what it’s best at.
If marketing wants more design control and faster page building, move the site to Framer and keep HubSpot forms, tracking, and CRM. If you need custom functionality or a large content library, move to Astro with a visual CMS, still connected to HubSpot.
If your team builds pages quickly with HubSpot’s drag-and-drop tools and relies heavily on smart content tied to CRM data, staying on HubSpot CMS can be the right call.
Themes and modules make custom layouts slow to build and hard to change.
Custom modules and HubL templating slow down work that would be simple elsewhere.
The CMS tier costs more than the website’s needs justify, alongside the rest of your HubSpot subscription.
Page speed is hard to push further within the platform’s templates and scripts.
The marketing site needs to feel as considered as the product it sells.
Leaving HubSpot CMS rarely means leaving HubSpot. Forms, tracking, chat, and CRM connect to either destination.
| Option | Best for | Who edits content | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Framer | Marketing sites where the team wants to design and publish without a developer | Marketing, directly in a visual canvas | Not for application UI or content that feeds other channels |
| Astro with a visual CMS | Content-heavy or performance-critical sites with custom integrations | Marketing, in the CMS; developers own templates and components | New templates need a developer |
Option
Framer
Option
Astro with a visual CMS
Not every site needs to move. Here’s the honest version.
Pages and blog posts move to the new platform while HubSpot forms, tracking code, chat, and CRM connections stay in place and are verified at launch.
Your Lovable app works and people are starting to rely on it. Here's how to tell when it needs a production rebuild, what we keep, and how the move works.
Read the guideFacing a Sitecore upgrade, XM Cloud move, or licence renewal? Compare moving to a headless CMS with Astro, and see when staying on Sitecore makes sense.
Read the guideOutgrown Squarespace? Compare moving to Framer or Astro for more design control, better SEO, and room to grow, and see when staying is the better call.
Read the guideYes. HubSpot forms, the tracking code, chat, and CRM integrations work on Framer and Astro sites, so reporting and attribution carry on as before.
Teams usually want more design freedom, a better developer experience, better performance, or to stop paying for a CMS tier that costs more than the site needs.
Framer for marketing-led sites that want visual design and fast publishing. Astro with a visual CMS for content-heavy or highly customised sites.
Yes. Forms are embedded or rebuilt with the HubSpot Forms API, and submissions, workflows, and attribution are tested before launch.
Not with a proper migration. URLs are mapped and redirected, metadata is preserved, and search performance is monitored after the move.